THIRD
INDIVIDUAL ARRESTED IN CASE INVOLVING BRIBERY, MONEY LAUNDERING, AND
CONSPIRACY
RELATED TO DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE CONTRACTS IN IRAQ AND KUWAIT
WASHINGTON - A
third individual was arrested and charged with conspiracy to commit
money laundering arising from a scheme involving bribery, conspiracy
and money laundering related to Department of Defense contracts in Iraq
and Kuwait, announced Assistant Attorney General Alice S. Fisher of
the Criminal Division and Assistant Attorney General Thomas O. Barnett
of the Antitrust Division.
The individual,
Carolyn Blake, is the sister of John L. Cockerham, a major in the U.S.
Army who was charged on July 22, 2007, with bribery, money laundering
and conspiracy arising out of his service as an Army contracting officer
in Kuwait in 2004 and 2005. Cockerham's wife, Melissa Cockerham, 40,
was charged at the same time for her role in the scheme with conspiracy
to defraud the government and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Major Cockerham and his wife were arrested in San Antonio on July 22,
2007, and the charges against the Cockerhams were unsealed on July 23,
2007, in U.S. District Court in San Antonio. Cockerham and his wife
are residents of Fort Sam Houston Army Base in San Antonio. The Cockerhams'
detention hearing has been set for July 31, 2007, at 10:00 a.m. before
Magistrate Judge Mathy.
The complaint against
Blake was filed today in U.S. District Court in Dallas. Blake was arrested
last night in Dallas. Blake, 44, a resident of Sunnyvale, Texas, and
Melissa Cockerham, are charged with conspiracy to defraud the government
and conspiracy to commit money laundering. According to the affidavit
filed in support of Blake's arrest, beginning in 2005, Major Cockerham
began accepting millions of dollars in bribes from contractors who had
Department of Defense contracts in Iraq and Kuwait that were managed
by Major Cockerham. The affidavit also alleges that under the direction
of Major Cockerham, Melissa Cockerham and Carolyn Blake received millions
of dollars in U.S. and foreign currency from these contractors and deposited
the monies in bank accounts and safe deposit boxes in Kuwait and Dubai.
Blake's detention hearing has been set for July 30, 2007, at 2 p.m.
in U.S. District Court in Dallas.
All three defendants
face up to 20 years in prison and a fine of $500,000 for the charge
of money laundering. The charge of bribery carries a maximum penalty
of 15 years in prison and a fine of $250,000. The conspiracy charge
carries a maximum penalty of five years in prison and a fine of $250,000.
This case is being
prosecuted by Trial Attorneys Ann C. Brickley and Richard B. Evans of
the Public Integrity Section of the Criminal Division, which is headed
by Chief William M. Welch II, and Trial Attorneys Mark W. Pletcher and
Emily W. Allen of the National Criminal Enforcement Section of the Antitrust
Division, which is headed by Chief Lisa Phelan.
The case is being investigated by special agents of the Army Criminal
Investigation Division, Defense Criminal Investigative Service; U.S.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the Department of Homeland Security;
the Federal Bureau of Investigation; the Internal Revenue Service -
Criminal Investigation Division; and the Special Inspector General for
Iraqi Reconstruction.
Today's charge is an example of the Department of Justice's commitment
to protect U.S. taxpayers from public procurement fraud through its
creation of the National Procurement Fraud Task Force. The National
Procurement Fraud Initiative announced in October 2006 is designed to
promote the early detection, identification, prevention and prosecution
of procurement fraud associated with the increase in contracting activity
for national security and other government programs.
Anyone with information
concerning bid rigging, bribery or other criminal conduct regarding
DOD contracts is urged to call the National Criminal Enforcement Section
of the Antitrust Division at 202-307-6694, or the Public Integrity Section
of the Criminal Division at 202-514-2000.
A complaint is
only a charge and is not evidence of guilt. A defendant is entitled
to a fair trial in which it will be the government's burden to prove
guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.