Former Dallas Independent School District (DISD)
Executive and Houston Businessman
Convicted in
Federal Corruption Trial
DALLAS—Following more than three weeks of
trial, a jury deliberated one day and found Ruben Bohuchot
and Frankie Wong guilty on all counts of a federal
indictment involving offenses related to their operation
of a bribery and money laundering scheme involving
Dallas Independent School District (DISD) technology
contracts, announced U.S. Attorney Richard B. Roper
of the Northern District of Texas. Sentencing is set
for October 20, 2008.
U.S. Attorney Roper said, “This is a great victory
for the citizens of Dallas. The unanimous verdict speaks
loudly that we will not tolerate corruption in our
school districts.” Roper continued, “This
conviction culminates an outstanding investigation
by the FBI, the Department of Education, the Internal
Revenue Service - Criminal Investigation, and the Anti-Trust
Division of the Department of Justice.”
Ruben B. Bohuchot, 59, of Dallas, was the Chief Technology
Officer at the Dallas Independent School District (DISD)
from September 1999 through February 2006. Frankie
Logyang Wong, 46, of Houston, Texas, co-owned and was
the president of Micro Systems Engineering, Inc., (MSE),
a computer reseller that provided computer products
and services to large corporations and school districts.
MSE was headquartered in Houston, with an office in
Dallas.
Specifically, the jury found Bohuchot and Wong each
guilty of one count of conspiracy to commit bribery
concerning a program receiving federal funds and one
count of conspiracy to launder monetary instruments.
In addition, both Bohuchot and Wong were convicted
of eight counts of bribery concerning programs receiving
federal funds, and aiding and abetting.
The jury also found Bohuchot guilty of one count of
obstruction of justice and two counts of making false
statements on tax returns. In addition, Bohuchot and
Wong will have to forfeit $1,192,263.90, which represents
the proceeds of the conspiracy to commit bribery and
money laundering.
The charge of conspiracy to commit bribery concerning
a program that receives federal funds carries a maximum
statutory sentence of five years in prison and a $250,000
fine. The money laundering conspiracy count carries
a maximum statutory sentence of 20 years in prison
and a $500,000 fine. Each of the bribery counts carries
a maximum statutory sentence of 10 years in prison
and a $250,000 fine. The obstruction of justice count
carries a maximum statutory sentence of 20 years in
prison and a $250,000 fine. Each tax charge carries
a maximum statutory sentence of three years in prison
and a $250,000 fine.
In his position as Chief Technology Officer at DISD,
Bohuchot was in charge of procuring technology contracts
for DISD. Bohuchot provided Wong and his company, MSE,
with inside information thus enabling MSE to obtain
two lucrative contracts with DISD. The two contracts
involved a “Seat Management” and an “E-Rate
6" program; these two contracts were worth approximately
$120 million.
William Frederick Coleman, III, a friend of Bohuchot’s,
was hired by Wong as a consultant to assist MSE, who
partnered with Hewlett Packard (HP), in obtaining the
seat management computer contract at DISD. The “Seat
Management” contract was an agreement in which
the school district leased desktop computers, while
the vendor continued to own and be responsible for
the computers’ upkeep. At the end of three years,
the school district would have the option of purchasing
the computers. By DISD policies, Coleman was not eligible
to assist MSE as a consultant because he had worked
for DISD within the previous five years and because
he was paid on a contingency fee basis.
Coleman, 52, formerly of Dallas, but currently residing
in Detroit, Michigan, was Deputy Superintendent and
Chief Operating Officer at DISD from August 30, 1999
through September 15, 2000. While at DISD, Coleman’s
responsibilities included managing the purchasing department.
DISD’s Purchasing Department worked with all
other departments in procuring items, including computers.
According to news articles in the Detroit Free Press,
Mr. Coleman also recently served as the Detroit Public
Schools Superintendent. Coleman pled guilty in May
to one count of attempting to influence a grand jury
and testified for the government at this trial. He
is scheduled to be sentenced in September 2008 by Judge
Lindsay and faces up to six months in prison.
The government presented evidence at trial that in
May 2002, Bohuchot, Wong, and Coleman, along with their
wives, traveled to Key West, Florida at MSE’s
expense. During that trip, Bohuchot brought a copy
of the specifications for the upcoming “Seat
Management” contract at DISD, even before DISD
had issued a public Request for Proposal (RFP). Providing
information relating to the upcoming contract, before
the information was provided to other vendors, assisted
MSE and HP in submitting a winning bid proposal to
DISD. From January 27, 2003, through July 11, 2005,
MSE received at least $4.4 million as a result of its
participation in the DISD “Seat Management” contract.
The government also presented evidence at trial related
to the “E-Rate 6" contract. The “E-Rate
program was administered by the Federal Communications
Commission to provide affordable telecommunications
and Internet services to eligible schools and libraries. “E-Rate” is
funded through taxes charged to all telephone consumers.
DISD was eligible to apply for “E-Rate” funds
in the sixth year of this program. Ultimately, the
contract that DISD obtained for “E-Rate 6,” under
Bohuchot’s direction, was worth $120 million.
Beginning in November 2002, MSE and other companies
formed a consortium for the purpose of submitting a
bid proposal relating to the “E-Rate 6” program
at DISD. On December 17, 2002, DISD published the “E-Rate
6" RFP, giving public notice to all vendors. On
January 20, 2003, the Consortium submitted a bid proposal
which DISD ultimately approved. Funds paid to the Consortium
under the “E-Rate 6” contract were received
by MSE and then forwarded to Acclaim Professional Services,
Inc. Wong and others formed Acclaim in late November
2002, prior to the “E-Rate 6" RFP being
made public, to distribute “E-Rate 6" contract
funds to other Consortium members. As a result of the “E-Rate
6" contract awarded to the Consortium, Wong personally
received millions of dollars. He was an owner of MSE
and Acclaim, as well as having interests in at least
two other companies that were part of the Consortium.
The government presented evidence that bribes to Bohuchot
by Wong and MSE included access to a sport-fishing
vessel, named “Sir Veza.” “Sir Veza” was
a 46' Post motor sport fishing yacht that was purchased
for approximately $305,000. This expensive yacht was
named and controlled by Bohuchot. To conceal Bohuchot’s
use of this yacht, Wong created and became president
of Statewide Marketing, LLC in October 2002. Testimony
revealed that Wong told the full-time “Sir Veza” boat
captain to keep Bohuchot happy and that if Bohuchot
did not use the boat, then Wong had no use for it.
After the second contract (“E-Rate 6")
was obtained, MSE, through Statewide Marketing, purchased
a second, larger yacht. The evidence showed that Bohuchot
named this yacht “Sir Veza II.” “Sir
Veza II” was a 58' Viking and purchased for almost
$800,000. Evidence was presented that Bohuchot used “Sir
Veza” I 90% of the time the boat was in use and
that Bohuchot used “Sir Veza II” 80% of
the time the boat was in use. All of the expenses and
operating costs of these two yachts, including the
boat captain’s salary, were paid by Statewide
Marketing and MSE at Wong’s direction.
In addition, Wong used MSE’s credit card to
pay for Bohuchot’s excessive entertainment expenses.
The evidence showed that from May 2002 to July 2005,
Wong paid for trips to Key West, Florida, on at least
five occasions for Bohuchot, Bohuchot’s family,
and Bohuchot’s friends. These expenses included
airline tickets, hotels, meals, boating, and other
entertainment.
Wong also gave cash to Bohuchot, disguising the true
nature of these cash payments. Bohuchot arranged for
Wong to hire Bohuchot’s son-in-law at MSE. Bohuchot
then told his son-in-law that he would be receiving
a second paycheck from Acclaim (for no additional work)
and that some of this money would be given to Bohuchot
in cash. Bohuchot’s son-in-law agreed to this
arrangement, saved 40% of the money for taxes as directed
by Bohuchot, and acted as a conduit to conceal regular
cash payments from Wong to Bohuchot.
In addition, the government presented evidence that
Bohuchot failed to report the income he received from
this bribery scheme on his 2004 and 2005 federal income
tax returns.
Bohuchot also attempted to persuade his son-in-law
to testify falsely in front of the grand jury during
the federal investigation of this case. Bohuchot told
his son-in-law to testify that the cash payments were
repayments for living expenses. Bohuchot’s son-in-law
testified in the trial that he did not testify as Bohuchot
requested and that the true nature of the cash payments
Bohuchot received were from Wong, not any repayment
by the son-in-law.
In addition to concealing payments to Bohuchot, Wong
also used his administrative assistant as a conduit
to conceal cash to himself. Wong’s assistant
testified that Wong directed approximately $1 million
to her over three years. She testified that she saved
40% for taxes, at Wong’s direction, and then
split the remainder of the money with Wong, which she
gave to Wong in cash. Both defendants concealed payments
to themselves by diverting payments through others.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney
Dayle Elieson, Assistant U.S. Attorney Linda Groves,
and Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Jennifer Bray.
Press Releases | Dallas
Home